Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Médecine du Sommeil ; 18(1):44-44, 2021.
Article in French | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2298627

ABSTRACT

Objectif La crise de la COVID-19 a perturbé les habitudes de milliards de personnes dans le monde. Pour de nombreux pays, le confinement à la maison est obligatoire et les familles sont forcées de vivre ensemble en permanence, dans des environnements souvent petits, avec leurs propres habitudes de sommeil et de veille. Le sommeil est essentiel pour nos vies et crucial pour équilibrer leur système immunitaire, la santé physique et psychologique. Méthodes Pour évaluer les problèmes de sommeil et l'utilisation des somnifères, nous avons réalisé une étude transversale d'un échantillon représentatif de la population générale en France (1005 sujets). Nous avons utilisé les mêmes éléments autodéclarés de plaintes de sommeil au cours des 8 derniers jours, tirés de l'échelle du Duke Health Profile, que ceux utilisés depuis 1995 dans les Baromètres de la santé français, une série d'enquêtes transversales sur diverses questions de santé publique. Résultats Après deux semaines de confinement, 74 % des participants ont signalé des plaintes de sommeil, comparativement à des taux de prévalence de 44 % à 49 % au cours des 25 dernières années. Les femmes ont déclaré plus de problèmes de sommeil que les hommes : 31 % contre 16 %. Les jeunes (18-35 ans) plus fréquemment que leurs aînés (79 % contre 72 % des 35 ans et plus) : 60 % ont déclaré que ces problèmes augmentaient avec le confinement, contre 51 % de leurs aînés. Enfin, 16 % des participants ont déclaré avoir pris des somnifères au cours des 12 derniers mois et 41 % d'entre eux ont déclaré avoir consommé ces médicaments depuis le début du confinement. Conclusion Ces résultats suggèrent que la crise de la COVID-19 est associée à de graves troubles du sommeil au sein de la population française, en particulier chez les jeunes.

2.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 21(10): 1505-1514, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2260203

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccine confidence among health care professionals (HCPs) is a key determinant of vaccination behaviors. We validate a short-form version of the 31-item Pro-VC-Be (Health Professionals Vaccine Confidence and Behaviors) questionnaire that measures HCPs' confidence in and commitment to vaccination. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey among 2,696 HCPs established a long-form tool to measure 10 dimensions of psychosocial determinants of vaccination behaviors. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models tested the construct validity of 69,984 combinations of items in a 10-item short form tool. The criterion validity of this tool was tested with four behavioral and attitudinal outcomes using weighted modified Poisson regressions. An immunization resource score was constructed from summing the responses of the dimensions that can influence HCPs' pro-vaccination behaviors: vaccine confidence, proactive efficacy, and trust in authorities. RESULTS: The short-form tool showed good construct validity in CFA analyses (RMSEA = 0.035 [0.024; 0.045]; CFI = 0.956; TLI = 0.918; SRMR 0.027) and comparable criterion validity to the long-form tool. The immunization resource score showed excellent criterion validity. CONCLUSIONS: The Pro-VC-Be short-form showed good construct validity and criterion validity similar to the long-form and can therefore be used to measure determinants of vaccination behaviors among HCPs.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination
3.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 21(5): 693-709, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1722041

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The lack of validated instruments assessing vaccine hesitancy/confidence among health care professionals (HCPs) for themselves, and their patients led us to develop and validate the Pro-VC-Be instrument to measure vaccine confidence and other psychosocial determinants of HCPs' vaccination behavior among diverse HCPs in different countries. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey in October-November 2020 among 1,249 GPs in France, 432 GPs in French-speaking parts of Belgium, and 1,055 nurses in Quebec (Canada), all participating in general population immunization. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses evaluated the instrument's construct validity. We used HCPs' self-reported vaccine recommendations to patients, general immunization activity, self-vaccination, and future COVID-19 vaccine acceptance to test criterion validity. RESULTS: The final results indicated a 6-factor structure with good fit: vaccine confidence (combining complacency, perceived vaccine risks, perceived benefit-risk balance, perceived collective responsibility), trust in authorities, perceived constraints, proactive efficacy (combining commitment to vaccination and self-efficacy), reluctant trust, and openness to patients. The instrument showed good convergent and criterion validity and adequate discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the Pro-VC-Be is a valid instrument for measuring psychosocial determinants of HCPs' vaccination behaviors in different settings. Its validation is currently underway in Europe among various HCPs in different languages.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/psychology
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(12): 5082-5088, 2021 12 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1569475

ABSTRACT

The French health authorities extended vaccination against COVID-19 to adolescents in June 2021, during the epidemic resurgence linked to the delta variant and because of insufficient vaccination coverage to ensure collective protection. In May 2021, we conducted a national online cross-sectional survey of 2533 adults in France to study their attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines and their acceptance of child/adolescent vaccination according to targeted age groups (<6 years; 6-11; 12-17) and its determinants. We applied a multi-model averaged logistic regression for each of these age groups to study the determinants of favorability to vaccination. Among the respondents, 62.7% (1597) accepted COVID-19 vaccination for adolescents, 48.3% (1223) for children aged 6-11 years, and only 31% (783) for children under 6 years. Acceptance increased with fear of contracting COVID-19 and trust in institutions and decreased as the COVID-19 vaccine risk perception score increased. People favorable to vaccination in general and those sensitive to social pressure were also more often favorable to vaccinating children/adolescents than those who were not. Drivers of acceptance were ranked differently for the different age groups. Understanding these differences is essential to anticipating obstacles to vaccination of these age groups and designing appropriate information and motivational strategies to support it.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
5.
Médecine du Sommeil ; 18(1):44, 2021.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1087163

ABSTRACT

Objectif La crise de la COVID-19 a perturbé les habitudes de milliards de personnes dans le monde. Pour de nombreux pays, le confinement à la maison est obligatoire et les familles sont forcées de vivre ensemble en permanence, dans des environnements souvent petits, avec leurs propres habitudes de sommeil et de veille. Le sommeil est essentiel pour nos vies et crucial pour équilibrer leur système immunitaire, la santé physique et psychologique. Méthodes Pour évaluer les problèmes de sommeil et l’utilisation des somnifères, nous avons réalisé une étude transversale d’un échantillon représentatif de la population générale en France (1005 sujets). Nous avons utilisé les mêmes éléments autodéclarés de plaintes de sommeil au cours des 8 derniers jours, tirés de l’échelle du Duke Health Profile, que ceux utilisés depuis 1995 dans les Baromètres de la santé français, une série d’enquêtes transversales sur diverses questions de santé publique. Résultats Après deux semaines de confinement, 74 % des participants ont signalé des plaintes de sommeil, comparativement à des taux de prévalence de 44 % à 49 % au cours des 25 dernières années. Les femmes ont déclaré plus de problèmes de sommeil que les hommes : 31 % contre 16 %. Les jeunes (18-35 ans) plus fréquemment que leurs aînés (79 % contre 72 % des 35 ans et plus) : 60 % ont déclaré que ces problèmes augmentaient avec le confinement, contre 51 % de leurs aînés. Enfin, 16 % des participants ont déclaré avoir pris des somnifères au cours des 12 derniers mois et 41 % d’entre eux ont déclaré avoir consommé ces médicaments depuis le début du confinement. Conclusion Ces résultats suggèrent que la crise de la COVID-19 est associée à de graves troubles du sommeil au sein de la population française, en particulier chez les jeunes.

7.
J Sleep Res ; 30(1): e13119, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-618687

ABSTRACT

The Covid-19 pandemic has disrupted the habits of billions of people around the world. Lockdown at home is mandatory, forcing many families, each member with their own sleep-wake habits, to spend 24 hr a day together, continuously. Sleep is crucial for maintaining immune systems and contributes deeply to physical and psychological health. To assess sleep problems and use of sleeping pills, we conducted a cross-sectional study of a representative sample of the general population in France. The self-reported sleep complaint items, which covered the previous 8 days, have been used in the 2017 French Health Barometer Survey, a cross-sectional survey on various public health issues. After 2 weeks of confinement, 74% of the participants (1,005 subjects) reported trouble sleeping compared with a prevalence rate of 49% in the last general population survey. Women reported more sleeping problems than men, with greater frequency or severity: 31% vs. 16%. Unusually, young people (aged 18-34 years) reported sleep problems slightly more frequently than elderly people (79% vs. 72% among those aged 35 or older), with 60% of the younger group reporting that these problems increased with confinement (vs. 51% of their elders). Finally, 16% of participants reported they had taken sleeping pills during the last 12 months, and 41% of them reported using these drugs since the lockdown started. These results suggest that the COVID crisis is associated with severe sleep disorders among the French population, especially young people.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Physical Distancing , Sleep Aids, Pharmaceutical/therapeutic use , Sleep Wake Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prevalence , Self Report , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL